Why complicate things indeed? If it had to be a binary file,
it could well have been the control file as you suggest.
All this spfile/pfile rigmarole is just an unnecessary
and unwarranted complication. But it 's great to generate
revenue out of OCP training...
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision@(protected)
-- -- Original Message -- --
From: "Powell, Mark D " <mark.powell@(protected) >
To: <oracle-l@(protected) >
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 10:47 PM
Subject: RE: More spfile goodness
> I have no problem with the concept of an spfile to hold database
parameters,
> but I wonder why Oracle did not use the existing control file. After all
> where else does control information belong?
>
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@(protected)
put 'unsubscribe ' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --
